Agile is being embraced by a wide range of industries
‘Going Agile’ appears to be a burgeoning trend among companies across Europe.
At the time of writing, on just one of the top international online recruitment sites, there are 772 job postings for Agile coaches in the UK, 779 in France, and 1327 in Germany. Organizations big and small are keen to adopt Agile principles. What’s more, these organizations are no longer limited to software companies. Browsing through the online job adverts, Royal Mail, Comic Relief, ING Bank, UK Cancer Research, and Lufthansa are among those companies looking for coaches to help introduce more agility into their ways of working.
So, Agile is spreading outside of the IT industry. But what does ‘Agile’ really mean? Read More
“What does your job consist of exactly? What are your responsibilities as a leader?”
These are questions I have asked many managers at different levels – team leaders, heads of department, directors – at leadership training sessions over the last ten years.
Listening to their answers I find that there is still a huge focus on “budgeting”, “assigning tasks”, “organising”, “controlling”, and “evaluating” – in other words on the management of tasks. Usually the more senior a supervisor is, the more confidently he manages his tasks.
But when it comes to topics such as motivation, inspiration or empowerment this confidence usually evaporates. “I am the only one who comes with ideas. How can I make the others more proactive?” “How can I make them care more?” “How can I motivate them?” managers complain. Read More
Hands-on or hands-off? – by novishari
Every leader has their own unique leadership style
Some managers are very good at communicating clear expectations, specifying roles and responsibilities, and creating clarity in general. Others’ strengths lie in the ability to motivate and energise their team by giving lots of feedback and encouragement.
Some leaders prefer a hands-on management approach. They are excellent at monitoring how tasks are being carried out and thus they can help out whenever a difficulty arises, giving their team the advice they need. Others tend to let their staff solve problems on their own and try to get involved only when it is absolutely necessary, thus giving their team the freedom they need.
Which of these leadership styles is the best? Read More
Micromanagement – by novishari
The manager buries his head in his hands. He complains: “I am exhausted. I have been working my backside off all year. My team has been hopeless recently. Whenever they write an internal report or a proposal for a client I have to spend another half a day working on it to get it done properly. My boss says that I should delegate more. But I haven’t got time to babysit my subordinates, to keep explaining why something is wrong and how to change it. By the time I’ve explained it all, I might as well have done it myself.”
Have you ever had a similar experience as a manager? Has it ever occurred to you that your team’s perceived incompetence might have something to do with your management style?
“Hands-on” managers who are deeply involved in the operative execution of tasks often complain about their team’s incompetence. They feel that their subordinates’ lack of skills and knowledge makes it necessary for them to get deeply involved in all operations.
On the other hand, when we talk to these very same subordinates they tell us that they feel micromanaged. They say they are capable of taking on more responsibilities. They complain that they are suffocating from the high level of control and a lack of freedom to make their own decisions.
Three reasons why a micromanager’s team gets more and more incompetent
If you are a manager who keeps a very tight reign by maintaining a high level of control, three things are likely to happen in your team: Read More